Sex-selective abortion and infanticide
From Open Encyclopedia
Sex-selective abortion is the practice of aborting a fetus after a determination (usually by ultrasound but also rarely by amniocentesis or another procedure) that the fetus is an undesired sex, typically female. It is the one area that all feminists, regardless their stance on abortion, seem to agree is an abuse of power[citation needed]. However, beyond that, feminists disagree on its purpose and its relationship to abortion rights[citation needed]. Some will state all abortions "select" to remove a life on the basis of something undesirable (personal reasons, child's possible health outcomes, etc...) and this is just another extenstion of that mentality[citation needed]. Others (seen as the mainstream of feminism) state that the idea of aborting because a fetus is female is in no way equal to other elective abortions and should be regarded differently[citation needed].
Sex-selective abortion was rare before the late 20th century because of the difficulty of determining the sex of the fetus before birth, but ultrasound has made it easy. Prior to this parents would alter family sex compostion through infantacide. It is believed to be responsible for at least part of the skewed birth statistics in favor of males in Mainland China, India, Taiwan, South Korea, Pakistan, and certain Arab states, such as Egypt and Saudi Arabia. Although the practice is often illegal, laws against it are extremely difficult to enforce because there is often no practical way to determine the parents' true motivation for seeking an abortion.
Sex selective infanticide is the practice of selective infanticide against infants of an undesired sex, again, typically female.
Sex selective abandonment is the practice of giving away an infant of an undesired sex, typically female, for adoption. It is the non-abortive and non-fatal alternative. If the biological parents want their infant child of an undesired sex out of their home but yet allow the infant to live, then they give away the child for adoption or export for foreign adoption.
Contents |
Prevalence
China
Sex-selective infanticide appears to have been practiced at various times in Chinese history such as the Qing dynasty due to population pressures. Sex-selective infanticide appears to occur infrequently in China today. However, there is a strong imbalance in sex ratios in China as well as South Korea, India, and Taiwan, probably the result of sex-selective abortion. In addition, there does appear to be considerable sex-selective abandonment of infants to circumvent China's one child policy.
Son preference is common in China: Chinese tradition says that most parents want their first child to be born a male. Son preference is also due to deeply rooted Confucian traditions, and Chinese parents desire sons in order to make familial propagation, security for the elderly, labor provision, and performance of ancestral rites. China calls the son preference situation the "missing girl" problem.
Parents may wish for a male child because in many cultures only a male will carry on the family name (traditionally when a bride gets married she effectively becomes a member of the groom's family), because they believe that a male is needed for work, or because they wish a male to earn an income needed to support the parents in their old age.
In response to sex-selective abortions, Mainland China has made it illegal for a physician to reveal the sex of a fetus, but female infanticide lingers in China as a result of this law. A non-abortive alternative is sex-selective abandonment, which is also prevalent in China. Most children (about 95 percent of them) in Chinese orphanages are able-bodied girls with living biological parents. These infants were abandoned by their biological parents and sent to orphanages for adoption just because they are female. Many abandoned Chinese girls have been adopted by the westerners and brought to the United States or Canada, while some others have been adopted domestically by childless Chinese couples.
India
The popularity of son preference in India could be attributed to socioeconomic reasons. There is a belief by certain people in India that female children are inherently less worthy because they leave home and family when they marry. The high number of "dowry deaths" (about 7,000 were reported in India in 2003), in which brides are murdered by their grooms' family members or commit suicide after suffering abuse and neglect, is also a major factor in gender preference.
Studies in India have indicated three factors of son preference in India, which are the economic utility, sociocultural utility, and religious functions. The factor as to economic utility is that studies indicate that sons are more likely than daughters to provide family farm labor or provide in or for a family business, earn wages, and give old-age support for parents. Upon marriage, a son makes a daughter-in-law an addition and asset to the family providing additional assistance in household work and brings an economic reward through dowry payments, while daughters get married off and merit an economic penalty through dowry charges. The sociocultural utility factor of son preference is that, as in China, in India's patrilineal and patriarchal system of families is that having at least one son is mandatory in order to continue the familial line, and many sons constitute additional status to families. The final factor of son preference is the religious functions that only sons are allowed to provide, based on Hindu tradition. Hindu tradition says that sons are mandatory in order to kindle the funeral pyre of their late parents and to assist in the soul salvation.
It is currently illegal to determine the sex of a child during pregnanacy using ultra-sound scans. Laboratories are prohibited to reveal the fetus sex during such scans. While most established labs comply with the law, determined persons can find a cheaper lab that would tell them what they want. Like the Chinese, the Indians also use the postnatal alternative, which is sex-selective infanticide. Some turn to people called Dais, women (historically) who specialize in sex selection, letting the baby boys live and killing the baby girls by giving them a sharp jerk, that is, turning them upside-down and snapping their spinal cords, and then declaring them stillborn.
The Lancet, a British medical journal, reported in early 2006 that there may have been close to 10 million female fetuses aborted in India over the past 20 years. This is extrapolated partly on the basis of reduction of female-to-male sex ratio from 945 per 1000 in 1991 to 927 per 1000 in 2001. The female-to-male sex ratio is even lower in cases where a couple has had a previous daughter, but no sons, dropping to 759 to 1000 for the second child if the first was a daughter, and 719 to 1000 for a third child if the first two were both daughters. This article has been challenged by the Indian Medical Association (IMA), which said that it was misleading and failed to take into account restrictions imposed by the courts in 2001. However, some say that the laws have not been effectively upheld, and successful prosecutions remain non-existent. [1] Perhaps contrary to popular expectations, the study also reported that sex selective abortion is more common among the wealthy and among educated women than among the poor and the uneducated. Part of this may be due to their being able to afford the associated expense. In addition, it is what would be expected by evolutionary theory, as a poor male is much less likely to reproduce than a poor female, while the reverse is true for wealthier people, as they have a high probability of attracting multiple females. [2]
Other causes of sex ratio imbalances
Sex-selective abortion, infanticide, and abandonment may not be the only causes of sex ratio imbalances in the countries mentioned above. Work by Emily Oster notes that women infected with hepatitis B virus are more likely to bear males than uninfected women. Her 2005 publication in The Journal of Political Economy suggests that the prevalence of hepatitis infection accounts for 75% of the sex ratio imbalance in China, 20% to 50% of the imbalance in the middle east and Egypt, but less than 20% of the imbalance in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Nepal. This is an active area of research and these findings are controversial.
Consequences
Gender-selective abortion and infanticide may make it more difficult for a generation to seek heterosexual romantic relationships. That happens years from the time of abortion after the children have grown up. For example, it is likely that Chinese men in the future may find it more difficult to find wives, simply because there will not be enough women to go around.
It is estimated that by 2020 there could be more than 35 million young 'surplus males' in China, 25 million in India, and 4 million in Pakistan, all of whom will be unable to find girlfriends or wives. In both China and India there are already growing rates of violent crime, sexual exploitation, and industrial accident fatalities which many attribute to large numbers of single men. The hypothesis is that single men do not have to return home every night to a wife and child, and thus may have less to lose when they engage in irresponsible behavior. Due to the shortage of Chinese women, Chinese men have also opted to marry North Korean and Vietnamese women. Some experts have argued that there is a slim but significant risk of political instability in these countries in the near future.
Sex imbalance is a maladaptive strategy in the long term as a family in a country with an excess of men would actually be better off having girls. This is because their rarity makes them more valuable, and women can ignore the worst men (who will be the ones who do not get married). They will actually end up marrying better men than they would if there was an equal sex balance, while families who chose to keep male children face a greater probability of ending up with no next generation.
External links
- Sex Selection at Birth; Statistics Singapore Newsletter, Vol 17 No.3 January 1995
- The Invisible Girl
- MSNBC - No Girls Please - In parts of Asia, sexism is ingrained and gender selection often means murder
- Akhilesh Mithal - Itihaas - Is Female Feticide Civilized?
- It's a Girl! - Waiting to Die: The Babies Sacrificed for China's One Child Policy
- Surplus Males and US/China Relations
- A Dangerous Surplus of Sons? - An analysis of various studies of the lopsided sex ratios in Asian countries
- Case study: Female Infanticide in India and China
- Where Have All the Girls Gone?
- Working paper by Emily Oster linking sex ratio imbalances to hepatitis B infection
- S2 China Report - China: The Effects of the One Child Policy
- Notification on Addressing in a Comprehensive Way the Issue of Rising Sex Ratio at Birth a UNESCAP document


